Recent Posts » CORRUPTOCRATS
Gotta love that tolerance eh?
Yep, especially when you see that every one of the recent mass shooters was indoctrinated in a liberal environment. They can’t just accept it when people disagree
That’s a ludicrous claim.
Please share your evidence that Seung-Hui Cho, Adam Lanza, Nidal Malik-Hasan, Jiverly Wong, Aaron Alexis, James Holmes, Michael McLendon, Scott Evans Dekrai, Christopher Speight, Robert Stewart, and Robert Hawkins were all “indoctinated in a liberal environment.”
When you’re done with those we’ll move on to the next batch.
just gotta love it. Can’t argue with statistics. Or Democrats!
1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United
In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United
States who later died from the wound.
In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of
the United States.
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan.
In 1984 James Huberty a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 22 people in a
In 1986 Patrick Sherril a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 15 people in an
Oklahoma post office.
In 1990 James Pough a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC
In 1991 George Hennard a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 23 people in a
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 5 coworkers
in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Asbrook a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 8 people at a
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed
attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003 Douglas Williams a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people at a
Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung – Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people
in Virginia Tech .
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner shot Rep.
Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes went into a movie theater and
shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people in
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people in a
One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservatives are involved.
SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns. Best idea I’ve
You should fact-check your copypasta if you don’t want to look like you have no idea what you’re talking about.
Loughner was a registered Independent. There’s no evidence that Lanza was a Democrat, though his mother was a Republican, homeschooling doomsday prepper and they lived in a right-leaning area, which suggests he was not a liberal. There’s no evidence James Holmes was even registered to vote. Seung-Hui Cho was a resident alien and not even legally allowed to cast a vote — and lived in a state without partisan registration.
I think that’s enough holes in your claims to dismiss your whole list as ridiculous without bothering to google the rest of the names, or delve into the fact that the Democratic party of the 19th century was not at all progressive.
I think there are enough holes in your head to qualify you as a leftist wingnut.
They were indoctrinated into a liberal environment because Communists like yourself long ago hijacked America’s education system, to the point now where 16 out of 17 “educators” are liberals, who blackball any conservative from a teaching post.
They were also indoctrinated into a liberal environment because the alphabet channel media (ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CPT, NET, CNN, MSNBC) are all beholden to their masters in the FCC, and the FCC toes the Democrat party line. And Democrats have long been trying to shut down the sole avenue of communication that hasn’t been a tool of left wingnuts – talk radio. Because they can’t allow dissenting speech or thought to jeopardize their Utopian dreams.
As usual, Democrats see the problem (criminals use guns) and since they can’t solve that problem, go after the overwhelming majority who legally and responsibly own guns.
You, sir, are an imbecile if you support “gun control” for law-abiding citizens. But I think we have already established that you are a Democrat, so I repeat myself.
Personal attacks such as yours are the clearest hallmark of a weak argument.
Because you declined to respond to my debunking of the previous post, I’m going to presume you concede that that list claiming to identify mass shooters as Democrats is completely erroneous.
But I want to be clear I understand what you’re saying about the “liberal environment” in which you say these shooters were “indoctrinated.” By your definition, anyone who went to public school or has been exposed to any broadcast television or cable news other than Fox has been indoctrinated by Communists? That’s like 90% of the US population you’re claiming is extremely dangerous.
…and you just proved my point that with all the forums worldwide,polls not skewed, etc, there’s NO way the election was honest and accurate, NO FUCKING WAY!
WE, will prevail, not the class of ’91 from Leningrad.
Let’s break this down.
“With all the forums worldwide,” — I have no idea what you’re talking about.
“polls not skewed,” — are you talking about the “unskewing the polls” that was done about a year ago by a non-statistician who was changing numbers he didn’t like and turned out to be way off the mark on Election Day?
“there’s NO way the election was honest and accurate, NO FUCKING WAY!” I’m presuming you’re talking about last year’s Presidential Election? Setting aside that this is yet another claim without a shred of evidence, are we even talking about whether there’s a connection between mass shootings and the political leanings of their perpetrators anymore?
“WE, will prevail, not the class of ’91 from Leningrad.” — Who are “we”? Do you think *everyone* is an undercover communist, or is it just people who ask that you provide proof (or hell, let’s start with basic cogency) for your arguments?
You are in denial if you don’t recognize that there was massive voter fraud in the last election. Not to mention a lying president and a corrupt media.
You lose……”dick” !
I would include FNC as well, plenty of Liberal thought on there too. Comrade O’Reilly is coming along nicely for the Left.
Well, you never answered his points,
His points are ludicrous.
What is copypasta? Sounds awful, like imitation spaghetti.
LOL @ your defense of liberal mass murderers.
Where did I ever defend these murderous monsters? I said your claim that they are liberal is baseless — and you’ve now responded twice to my comments without providing any evidence backing up your assertion.
“There’s no evidence that Lanza was a Democrat” LOLOLOLo ok!!?? so hes register as a independent? that’s your proof? lol…did he write for any publications?…did he volunteer for any politician?…lol..were his parents registered democrats?…I believe the statement was “was indoctrinated in a liberal environment”. What would his voter registration have to do with that?..LOLOL….
If his voter registration is irrelevant, why did you paste a list of individuals you were claiming were Democrats? Nowhere in that long, error-filled, copy-and-pasted post do the words “indoctrinated,” “liberal,” or “environment” appear. Instead, it’s just a fact-light swing at the Democratic Party.
But now you’re saying you *don’t* care about party registration? Ok, great — let’s go back to the initial argument, which you didn’t make but appear to endorse: that “every one of the recent mass shooters was indoctrinated in a liberal environment.”
Where is your evidence that this is so? Please feel free to use the list of mass shooters I provided above as a starting point for your argument.
where is your evidence, its NOT!!? Moron!!
one name out of all of them..LIBTARD!!!!???
“do the words “indoctrinated,” “liberal,” or “environment” appear”..you are stupid? yes!!..look above to the comment you ignorantly replied to??? Moron!!!
I’m not making a claim, you are. Your argument. Your responsibility to provide evidence. That’s how argument works.
As I said in my comment, “let’s go back to the initial argument, which you didn’t make but appear to endorse: that ‘every one of the recent mass shooters was indoctrinated in a liberal environment.’ Where is your evidence that this is so?”
If you’re just going to keep asserting the same argument again and again without providing any evidence, you’ve failed and I’m done discussing this with you. (If you need an explanation about the difference between evidence and assertion, please say so and I am happy to clear that up for you.)
God you cant be this Obtuse..but here it is…
“im not making a claim” ?? really Moron!!???
i’m right Mark Tipton
• 5 hours ago • 12 1
Benjamin i’m right
• 2 hours ago • 1 3
That’s a ludicrous claim.
do you see and understand..that you made this in reference to Mark’s point…you CLAIMED it was “LUDICROUS” does that help you follow your own CONVERSATION!!??? Libtard!!
Ah! Ok. I’m happy to back up that claim.
I ARGUE that your argument is ludicrous because you provide no evidence, and good arguments have evidence.
I SUPPORT my argument by showing that you have provided no evidence, which you’ve conceded by stating repeatedly that it’s my responsibility to find evidence for your argument.
If you’re not familiar with good argument, here’s more SUPPORT for my position: a guide on how to make a good, complete logical argument, which makes it very clear that a good argument has sources:
(If you don’t like that source for some reason, just google “elements of a good argument. They’re all going to say reliable sources are critical to a good argument.)
So that’s my argument. Reliable sources of evidence are necessary for an argument to be good; your argument does not have ANY sources; therefore, your argument is not good.
So now that I’ve gone, here’s a template you can use for your own work.
YOUR ARGUMENT: Mass shooters become violent because they are indoctrinated by liberalism.
YOUR EVIDENCE: [Here's where you put your evidence -- that is, facts that demonstrate that your argument is accurate.]
Go for it!
You would know well about arguments. Most Libtards like you are very unhappy little people !
How many guns do you have Benny?
Please tell us that you are through. You are becoming incredibly tiresome.
If you’re trying to convince everyone liberalism is a mental illness it’s working.
His mother was in fact a registered Republican. Benjamin is right that list of “democratic killers” Is highly suspect. at best.
Lanza was a satanist. He is therefore a leftist. He also was clearly mentally ill, so again, he had to be a leftist.
Still, that’s a lot of goddamned Democrats, even if we have to move Loughner, Lanza and Cho into the “undetermined, but not Republican” column.
Here’s a few more to make up for them:
Amy Bishop (University of Alabama)
Omar Thornton (Hartford Distributors)
Aaron Alexis (Washington Navy Yard)
Floyd Corkin (Family Research Center)
James Lee (Discovery Channel)
No Tea Partiers on that list, I’ve noticed.
Who is “a lot of goddamn Democrats”? No one’s provided any evidence that the rest of that list is made up of Dems. Do you have a source for that?
And who’s arguing that people on the right are more likely to commit mass shootings? I certainly have not. That claim would be completely without any evidence.
(By the way, please link to yours that those people were liberal Democrats.)
“Who’s arguing that people on the right are more likely to commit mass shootings? I certainly have not.”
First thing you’ve been right about.
Hey, don’t get mad at me! Put down that gun! No! NO!
No one can “prove” anything to a “know it all” Libturd! Go away Benjamin, you’re Momma is calling you to supper !
Would you accept any “source” other than MSLSD 0r the Clinton News Network? You libs have your own concept of reality which aligns with your mental disorder.
More Buddhist’s on the list then Tea Partiers.
Nickname for Benjamin…….is “dick”
Give it up benny, Bagga owned you.
“Right-leaning area”? Connecticut is so blue they elected a Senator who was caught in a lie about his military record. (Blumenthal).
Loughner may not have been a Democrat but he was a Leftist. He loved his copies of Mein Kampf. Are before you reveal more ignorance by saying Nazi are right wingers. They’re not. Communist and Nazis are both on the same end of the political scale which is on the left.
Lanza’s Mother was a Democrat or was sure as shlt married to one. Lanza’s dad, Peter, was an Executive at GE a well known den of Obama’s supporters. James Holmes was a government grant sucking researcher, whose repaid his wonderous opportunity to spend our money by buying tac. helmets and weapons with which to shoot unarmed victims.
Loughner had tons of material and track record to show a distinctive hard left persuasion as did Lanza.
The Democrat party started Pro(Re)gressive (the so called “progressives” were called reactionary and totalitarian as early as the 1880, with Woodrow Wilson their godfather. It now dominates their party with more than half self-identifying as socialist/Marxist.
And isn’t it sweet that the “progressives” have views that are decidedly tribalistic and primitive throwbacks to prehistoric cultures.
In fairness to ‘Benjamin’ Loughner and Lanza were absolute bonkers no matter what their political registration. I still want to know the EXACT PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS both were on or recently quit before their killing sprees; but apparently big pharma is spending tons of money to keep this secret. I’ll bet a significant fraction of my paycheck I know the answers.
It should be illegal for democrats to breathe.
Lincoln was shot in 1865. Most of the rest are reasonably accurate.
In a word, “yes” to the overwhelming majority.
… that’s five words, none of which provide any evidence that your claim is valid. Get Googling! Or concede that you’re making up your point with no evidence to support it.
The answer was yes. Typical lib moves.
Muddy the discussion with your minutia even though you knew the yes was in quotes as my answer.
Second lib move, have someone else do their research.
No thanks, I know the facts. The majority of the recent shootings, newtown, aurora, gabby giffords, the military hospita, the navy base, probably the kid in the mall and others, all libs.
You made the claim. It’s not my research; it’s yours. Can you imagine turning in a research paper, and the footnotes all just said “Professor: prove me wrong”? What grade do you think you would get?
Please share the source of these facts you know. Stack up the proof behind your arguments, link after link, right here. (Proof, not more people simply making the same assertions without evidence.) I am not only paying attention — I am begging you to please, please prove your point that “the majority of the recent shootings… [were] all libs.” But if all you’ve got is personal insults and the same unsupported assertion over and over again, that’s pretty boring.
Luckily I know the difference between a professor and some fool on the internet…and when I was getting my BS in engineering and my MBA, with a 3.9 GPA, you can believe my research was thorough. I don’t have time to educate every moonbat i come across. I doubt you could be convinced with facts anyway, because LIBERALISM IS A SICKNESS.
Congrats — that’s an awesome academic accomplishment.
I love facts! I far prefer talking about measurable, confirmable facts than talking in broad, unsubstantiated opinion. I’m sure as a highly trained engineer, you see where I’m coming from. You wouldn’t want to just take someone’s word on critical measurements without at least finding out where they got their metrics, would you?
So please, pretty-please, share your facts.
Keep trying, the facts are out there, even some others have posted them in this link. It’s common knowledge, I won’t do your homework.
I’m actually feeling charitable.
Where were they posted? I haven’t seen them in this thread. You’re not referring to that list of “Democrat mass shooters” I debunked earlier, are you?
It’s your argument, and so it’s your homework. That’s how argument works. But no sweat. You’re totally right that you have no need to prove your case or demonstrate that anything you’re saying has any validity whatsoever. That right is guaranteed to you by that Constitutional Amendment that comes one before the Second.
Debunked…lol. That’s funny. Just look at the article above. Another hypocrite lib against guns but threatening to use them in anger. This is what you came to defend?
There’s no context to that video at all except that an idiot on a bicycle threatened to get a gun and shoot people. Which was stupid of him. But unless I missed a piece of news this afternoon, he’s not a mass shooter.
Thanks for providing that link to a Google search. Here was the second hit: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/06/10/740969/-How-Many-Mass-Murderers-were-Liberal
Good read. Would love to know your thoughts. And also see any actual evidence (not Google searches, and not links to blogs that ALSO have no evidence, but are just assertion).
That’s a good read? Clearly objective with examples of mature clear thinking, such as…
“the hate-speech of the right wing”
“once private lot of cowards”
“worships a merciful and loving God who smites homosexuals”
“sycophantic lunatics slime their way out from Storm Front, Free Republic, Red State and Michelle Malkin’s skirt”
“holding their breath and stamping their feet is not going to get them”
“With the the exception of Cho Seung-Hui”
Why leave Cho out? doesn’t fit the agenda?
3 names listed, no political affiliation referenced, never heard of any of them but they are all obviously insane.
Were you trying to make a point? This is not what i would call reliable data.
Thanks for reminding me that many people are completely beyond hope.
If you recall a few comments back, this is from the link YOU provided as evidence of YOUR point. I thought it odd that you’d submit something to back up your argument when the second linked article was a far-left screed against conservatives. Is that your strongest evidence?
Don’t know why Cho was left out. Might be because as a resident alien he was unable to vote, let alone register for a political party, but that’s completely conjecture on my part.
I posted it for you to look at the shooters i mentioned, the shooters that are all over the news and the shooters that are constantly being used to push the liberal agenda with the blood of innocent victims.
HAHAHAHAHAHALOLO Benny Benny….you make a claim and cant back it up???..please Benny your CLAIM that Marks statement was LUDICROUS?? where is YOUR evidence to debunk this Statement??? LOLOLOLO…..and you debunked everyone of those names I posted..because you read..that Loughner was a registered Independent?? LOLOLOLO this is how you “Argue” and “debate”?…YOU CLAIMED it was LUDICROUS.?? YOU DID!!!!!…now either post some PROOF that would show both of us to be wrong ..Or STFU you sudo intellectual academic little sniveling adolescent libtard….
… I already provided that. But here it is again: Good arguments provide evidence. No evidence has been provided for the statement that liberal indoctrination leads to mass shootings. My evidence for that is that there is no evidence in this thread.
So please, pretty please with a cherry on top, provide a credible source to back up your assertion that left-wing “indoctrination” leads to mass shootings. All you’ve provided so far is an unsourced list of claims, none of which you’ve back up with anything. I’ve done everything I can to try to help you out, including linking to instructions on how to make a basic argument. I don’t know that there’s much more I can do.
You sound like a little 10 year old punk in Mom’s basement to me boy !
Also Ft Hood~~~ Registered Democrat and radical Muslim who supported Al Qaeda and Hamas
Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals
Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat
Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal
Connecticut School Shooter- ~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians.
Well, since I saw you in the gym, and thought you’d gone in the wrong locker room…
Let’s just say, we know one fact, and I’m sorry for your loss – assuming you ever had any of the equipment to begin with.
I don’t have a lot of use for most professors, but my wife is an a very different kind of Professor. She is a conservative.
How about you try to prove they are not Democrats.
Without question, their murderous crimes demonstrated that they do not respect,
or support, the rule of Constitutional law.
Now, MoveOn to the next batch of dry taints in need of your attention, you disarmed eunuch.
Just nit-picking, but – the US is not a republic anymore; it has deteriorated to a democracy, which is not surprising: Demos (Mob ) Cracy (Rule) was the approach the Federalists took to get the states to ratify the Constitution.
But the USSR was a democracy. People could vote for or against the candidate, in secret ballots.
Didn’t change the tyranny….
They all supported Obama and vote democrat.
Looks like you are reading off a Democrat’s voter’s roll.
if they went to public school the odds are that they were in fact subjected to very far-left indoctrination. To this day the history books portray Joe McCarthy as an irrational nut when in fact he has been proven correct in his assessment of Soviet espionage, if anything he under-estimated how bad it was. Web search “Venona” and “Mitrokhin Archive” and see for yourself.
That said, the key variable in the mass shooting cases is the mind meds they were on. These drugs are over-used and actually cause violence. (see “The Mood Cure” by Julia Ross, p. 220-225). It’s a national scandal that this is conspicuously edited out of the “news”. It looks like the corporate media is owned by the drug companies. Even PBS lowered itself into the gutter while trying to spin the Adam Lanza case, not mentioning his meds at all and then implying that the poor woman who wrote the “I am Adam Lanza’s mother” blog has after all been rescued by yet another med for her son. There is a site documenting the shocking numbers of these cases going back to…the dawn of Prozac, at SSRIstories.com Did you realize that in the 1950s there was just a single mass shooting case? The 50s, when there were virtually NO gun regs?
Lets start with Nidal Malik-Hasan Former Maj US Army) who was indoctrinated in an anti America fanatical issues (sounds liberal to me), Decided to kill Americans because he disagreed with them (sounds liberal to me). Hates the United States and its’ Constitution (sounds liberal to me).
Evie Hudak………..a union school teacher as her sole experience and an obvious progressive tool who refuses logic and common sense ……………..and this is who is making policy for CO…………..the folks in her district got what they deserved if they elected her twice………..wake up people!
This is why don’t trust law abiding citizens to own guns. They know that in their hands, with their liberal, childlike thinking, they would use them irresponsibly.
So, do you think we should take guns away from liberals, or do you think we should allow dangerous, irresponsible people to have guns?
“So, do you think we should take guns away from liberals, or do you think we should allow dangerous, irresponsible people to have guns”
Benny..thats alittle redundant, No? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO
You just gotta love it. Can’t argue with statistics. Or Democrats!
In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United
In 2010 a mentally ill Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner shot Rep.
Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
No NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservatives are involved.
So to answer your very ignorant question Benny..” should take guns away from liberals”…YES a fifth grader could tell ya that!!!
SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.
You already posted that list, which I’ve already shown is inaccurate.
But I’m far more interested in the fact that you disagree with the Second Amendment and don’t believe that the right to own guns ought to be inalienable. First person in this thread I’ve seen with that opinion.
‘Inalienable’ is from the Declaration. The wording is ‘shall not be infringed.’ Yelling ‘FIRE’ in a crowded theater or ‘DONUTS’ in a sheriff station are not protected speech, and handing a loaded gun to a maniac is also not protected behavior. We have too many legal safeguards to annoy the law abiding and too little enforcement to protect the innocent.
Who is we? I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of liberals. Because they know they can’t be trusted, they think no one can.
“We” is the American people, acting through the force of the US government. In other words, in a hypothetical world where you got to make the rules, would you change the Second Amendment in order to take guns away from liberals,
Do you believe that everyone should be able to own guns even if you think that they are dangerous, irresponsible, and prone to mass killing?
Please don’t speak for me, as I am the American people.
I’m not — I’m asking *you* to speak for the American people. What do *you* think American gun policy should be when it comes to liberals, whom you believe to be dangerous, untrustworthy, and prone to mass killing? Should they be allowed to have guns or not, if you got to make that call?
The constitution not good enough for you?
A prohibited person is clearly spelled out in Federal law. Although liberals love to tell other people what’s best for them, I’ll stick with the founding fathers. They seem like a pretty smart bunch.
Great — not all ostensibly pro-gun individuals think liberals should have their rights protected by the 2nd Amendment. I’m relieved you don’t actually think liberals are so dangerous that they ought to have their guns taken away.
An obvious false choice. Also ‘acting through the force of the US Government’ is totally false and misleading. It should read ‘outside the force of the US Government’ which is why the Bill of Rights was written and adopted.
It falls right in line with the old joke that a liberal/progressive is someone will let you do what you want as long as it’s mandated.
Shouldn’t the police be investigating this blatant threat?
If she had any honor, she would have the courtesy to challenge her adversary to a public duel.
Such delicious irony: If you don’t agree with banning guns, I’ll shoot you!
Where do these idiots find the brain power to remember to breath?
Liberals are fucking insane
This truly illustrates the average obama voter. Vicious, predatory and violent.
Please tell me Evie Hudak doesn’t teach Statistics…
Arvada has too many Obama yard signs to ever prosecute one of their fellow leftist scum.
Yeah, shes’ “tolerant”.
Does this person have not one shred of cognizance that, in the name of “Gun Control” he threatened to kill people with a gun ?
Funny, I’ve never threatened to kill anyone whose political views differed from mine.
What’s wrong with me?
You’re not a liberal.
Typical right-wingers using sob stories instead of hard facts.
Typical borderline psychotic homosexual in denial………….
The Gabby Giffords shooting could have only happened in Arizona in a “gun-free-zone”.
How may less would have died if someone with skills pulled out a .45 and shot the killer?
So do “gun-free” zones kill or do t hey not?
Do gun-control Nazis kill or do they not?
Does the second amendment save lives or does it not?
Hudak and her kind are steaming piles of shit.
We should stop calling these people “liberals” or “progressives”; they are anything but.
They are totalitarians.
I’m old school. I call them hippies.
In the case of “progressive”, they already are; it’s just the polite euphemism for “totalitarian”.
that why liberals should not own guns . way too emotional.
Because we don’t look like complete idiots when we use the actions of one crazy a4shole to generalize their whole ideology or them as a group?
Typical behavior of borderline psychotic homosexuals and bisexuals………….feel better now?
No, I still feel pretty sad that people like you are clogging up the gene pool.
Y’know, in some states, including mine, this kind of threat can be met with immediate and legal violence. The reason I know is that I have done the beat down boogie on someone threatening exactly that to me. Why “law enforcement” was not called on this asswipe I don’t know.
If they are threatening to leave and get a gun and there are witnesses, it would seem a valid threat deserving of pursuit by law enforcement but anywhere I have ever lived, it would likely be difficult to justify violence at that time as their need to go obtain a weapon likely indicates they are not in possession of one and not an immediate threat. It would not however, by unlawful to remind them that we are all proud and competent, lawful gun-owners and having much more experience, they would likely not survive the encounter upon their return.
I agree with your assessment on justification; however, there is enough historical evidence of the people making the threat actually returning (at least in this state) to justify an immediate response. The responding officers agreed, and only one person was hurt. In fact, in my case, the person approached me (carefully) several years later and thanked me for stopping him from doing something so stupid. He did, in fact, have a shotgun at home and was intending to follow up on his threat.
Well apparently if he was able to thank you at a later date, you also used at least a modicum of common sense and restraint. Sadly, that common sense is becoming increasingly less common.
I’m starting to recognize this so-called “Benjamin” in this thread. He/she has been in other threads, I’m sure using other handles, with the sole intent of attempting to debunk other’s arguments. People, recognize a troll and ignore it when it appears. You’ll notice that by the time he/she is done, the entire point of the artical itself is forgotten. Oh, and “Ben”, don’t bother to reply to me, as you are blocked.
What was role of law enforcement in this episode?
They are busy sucking her watt.
PLEASE SEE http://www.gunowners.org
I was flipped off in front of my 80 year old mom and my autistic son by a longtime friend(I thought) because of my conservative Christian stance…which I will not back down from, and that includes our constitutional 2nd amendment rights, even though I don’t own a gun…
Typical liberal, death threats and illogical babbling. Someone should have beat him to death with a hammer.
Some so called peacenick Hudak supporters were intimidating the people taking the recall petitions around in my neighborhood. They were also INTIMIDATING PEOPLE SIGNING THE PETITIONS by shooting pictures and movies while people signed the petitions. My neighbor told them to stop filming him and get off of his property. They refused.
I can provide more information to the authorities if needed. I shot a picture of the people and my neighbor was not very happy!
Kind of hypocritical of the Left to refuse to require ids when voting and then wilfully and intentionally intimidate the voters by shooting their pictures while they are exercising their right as legal voters.
I guess that would make them hypocrites. But that is the Left for you. Aren’t they wonderful.
So-called “men” like this don’t have the cajones to carry out their threat. They are nothing but whiny, little girly men trying to act tough.
The video is 9 seconds. How exactly is it shown that the idiot saying this stuff is, in fact, a supporter of Hudak? The guy might just be some random d’bag.
The only one’s getting “killed” will be the anti-gun losers !
The video disappeared ….
We really gotta get serious with these liberal nutcases. It is way past time to use their tactics against them. We play too nice.
So why is this nut job still on the street? I thought making threats to kill someone is a crime and the person should be arrested and charged.
At least we know who Should NOT have a gun .. some gun control advocates!
Doesn’t colorado have a law about terroristic threats? But good luck in finding a decent bureaucrat in colorado that will actually enforce a law against a flaming liberal.
Yes, this certainly shows we have nothing to fear by surrendering our guns and simply placing our faith in all those mentally-stable leftists to not march us all into death camps or anything….
just more proof of the gun control needed …………… BAN ALL GUN OWNERSHIP BY DEMOCRATS/LIBERALS/OBAMANUTS
This ban would have stopped the mass shootings of the last 5 years ……….. all these mass shooters/murderers were democrats/liberals/obamaloons
No gun control for anyone. The Liberals/Socialists/Progressives/Communists/Democrats assume that the whole country is as debased, immoral and conscienceless as they are. Obama is their new spiritual leader, the Messiah, ad as an obedient Marxist servant is carrying out 40 years of rejected leftist policy in one administration. I firmly believe that he should be subjected to criminal prosecution, once he is out of office. I would like to seem incarcerated for the rest of his unnatural life, since he can’t be executed due to his armies of anti-American vermin.
She has shown she is mentally unstable by threatening the signature gathers. She has shown she is stupid by the questions and comments she made to the young lady. Why was she elected in the first place? I hope she is recalled.
Dam these liberals are stupid.
The gun control guy doesn’t have a gun, but he should consider the people he is threatening are probably all armed. Besides, who would take a threat seriously when it is made by Justin Beiber on a bicycle.
Obviously the time has come for sane taxpayers to carry weapons to defend themselves 24/7 against psychotic liberals.
Isn’t the National Socialists argument on abortion, “If you don’t like them don’t have one.”?
If you don’t like guns, don’t own one. Seems simple enough for even that crowd to understand. Seems so…..
National Socialists, known in an earlier time in our history as Nazi’s. And currently masquerading as liberals.
The next gun control supporter in CO is going down! We are coming for you commies!
why is it that its ALWAYS The left who can openly do death threats and NOTHING happens.
ALIMPC in 1955……….borderline psychotic homosexuals and bisexuals were given a free pass based on fraud…………..
I have worked the Hudak Recall effort, flagging in traffic to sign the petition at recall signiture gathering stations, during whatever hours I can volenteer over the past 1 1/2 months. Let me tell you from personal first hand experience, these kind of threats are common amoung Hudak supporters. I’ve witnessed with my own ears, death threats and vile profaine insults hurled from her supporters as they pass my location on the side of the road. It’s been a real learning experience. Gun-grabbing socialists don’t lose gracefully.
Typical behavior of borderline psychotic homosexuals and bisexuals, the most violent among us, making death threats and threats to physical harm. These are the present day HOMONAZis no different than their HOMONAZI, Communist counterparts of nearly eighty years ago. Do you still believe that borderline psychotic homosexuals and bisexuals, the most violent among us, are the victims they were portrayed to be with the revision of the ALIMPC in 1955 based on the fraudulent and fallacious research of Alfred Kinsey?
Gun control was NEVER about reducing crime, and notice that the gun control freaks are very pro-criminal in legal issues.
Just like Obamacare has nothing to do with helping those in need.
It is only about CONTROL!!
See, this is why partisan politics is such bullshit. You refuse to even argue about the same thing your “opponent” is arguing about. Gun control is in fact about reducing gun related crime and deaths, animal rights is about animals, and Obamacare, as bad as it is, is about trying to get everyone health care. You just cry about “control” because you don’t want to actually engage anyone, instead just get them riled up in a frothy stew of partisan groupthink. Refusing to acknowledge your opponent’s argument isn’t going to make yours any stronger or better.
Gun Control, Animal Rights, and Obamacare have little to do with Guns, Animals or Health and a lot to do with people control. The spirit of the Enlightenment as codified in the US Constitution is all about LIMITING the ability of the Government to F…. with people, their liberty and their preferences.
I left Denver a couple of years ago for California. When I heard of the gun control lunacy that was being imposed on Colorado, I felt all was lost. But then two of the legislators championing the bill were recalled, and my faith in the people was, at least for the moment, restored. How could this state fall to Communist gun-grabbers? I can hardly believe it.
i don’t know about colorado but that is with 5 years for making terrorist threats in california and we will never know how many rounds that poor woman could have put in that rapist
Why would anyone expect better from a liberal?
Does anyone else find it ironic that a “gun control champion” threatens to “go home and get a gun”??
So by this, are we to understand that only liberal wackos should be allowed to own guns??
Just about all of the mass killings were done by leftist liberal wackos.
No, it’s not ironic at all. Our Benevolent Mothers and Fathers in Government pass laws that apply only to the little people because we are incapable of managing our own lives.
That’s conveying a threat and it is a crime. For those that were there, they should press charges. If it is to be taken seriously then put her rear in jail. It’s okay for them to have firearms but for others it’s different.
So an anti-gun Democrat Union thug threatens to kill some Conservatives? Its time to play hard ball with these liberals, they threw out the rule book a long time ago.
This behavior is typical of Communist Bolsheviks. This Hudak supporter knows full well that he is protected by the Communist statists that portray themselves as representatives of the people. That is why he makes such hollow but dangerous threats.
Gun control and Obozocare. Both are about controlling the people.
Adam Lanza and james Holmes were pattsies, all the evidence is there, they were drugged with scopolamine, the Obama admin set this up to usher in gun control, it was originally conceived in St Petersburg by Obama’s benifactors.
Is the jerk in jail yet or being paid and protected to harass conservatives? BTW she/he/it has a gun, so use this hypocritical creature and its threats publicly in advertisements to expose them.
Why hasn’t that supporter been arrested? Liberal are the bane of our society.
The US has deteriorated to a democracy, which is not surprising: Demos (Mob ) Cracy (Rule) was the approach the Federalists took to get the states to ratify the Constitution.
The USSR was a democracy. People could vote for or against the candidate, in secret ballots.
Didn’t change the tyranny….
We have the same (one party) here; it’s why the Communist party doesn’t bother running anyone in the national elections. The Big Two adopted all the planks of the Communist platform; they just needed to infiltrate the supporting elements – education, edutainment (you might call it “news” – I include FOX in that), law, and mass communications (including publishing). No conspiracy needed, and the results speak for themselves: CAIR reviews Social Studies school texts, to ensure there’s no negative mention of Islam… Gays and lesbian authors must be represented on the list of literature for English (I’d wager they won’t accept James Joyce, either; not even sure of Conrad… Etc.)
English classes don’t teach English (and anyone else recall the Ebonics debacle?)
Math classes don’t teach math – geometry is too hard, algebra, too… Don’t even think of getting to Trig, Diff Eq, Linear Algebra…
Even SCIENCE classes are being used to push the agenda: Focusing not on the SCIENCE, but the “Pioneering women” in science.
Boys are medicated to compliance if not somnambulance (and there are permanent mental and physical side effects); girls are taught to think their sh!t don’t stink.
Children are considered property of the state.
And the Founding Fathers are labeled “terrorists.”
Seriously, how can anyone NOT think the society is being socially engineered by Leftists? And the whirlwind is the result….
An she stands as “Exhibit number 1″ as to why the Second Amendment is the ONLY place the phrase “Shall not be infringed” occurs in the Constitution and Amendments.
It is a shame about all that happened in the 1920s and 1930s that damaged that particular aspect.
Braley Enlists Elizabeth Warren to Bolster Populist Image [WFB]
Labor Department Spent $2,627 a Week on Propaganda Posters [Free...
How much money can a lobbyist make? [Center for Public...